Thematic review of UK KIDs

The FCA has requested feedback on proposed changes to the UK PRIIPS KIDS regulation to a new CCI KIDs regime.

Before responding to the FCA consultation we conducted a thematic review on current KID disclosures.

Our thematic review has identified that any changes to regulations must address:

  • An economic principle called “a market for lemons”, applying this principle may contribute to improving discount rates in the UK investment trust market.
  • We have also identified a need to report on net returns, and fees from manufacturers consistently. We submit that the presentation of performance scenarios (Good, Moderate, Poor & Stressed) setting out clearly net returns, fees, and contributions to performance for each scenario is a logical way to proceed and will consistently join together the distribution chain.
  • Where platforms take fees, it should be from the manager’s net returns in each scenario, to avoid misleading investors by double counting the managers fees.

Myth from manufacturers: Costs are reflected in the share price; therefore, we don’t have to show costs in our KID.

Myth: Platforms are double counting costs.

Myth: Investment trust companies should be treated like ordinary listed companies with no onerous cost disclosures.

Myth: No one reads KIDs, so we shouldn’t bother with them.

Myth: Disclosures hurts discount rates and current wide discount rates are only down to economic conditions.

Myth: Removing costs from my KID will give me a competitive advantage in the market place.

Myth: The new CCI regime will improve the risk rating of funds.

Myth: Not saying anything in my KID will make it good.